Skip to content

Harvard Wins Court Battle, Faces Trump’s Tougher War Ahead

Photo by Xiangkun ZHU / Unsplash

Harvard University won a temporary reprieve this week after a federal judge restored more than $2 billion in research funding frozen by the Trump administration.

Judge Allison Burroughs ruled that the administration improperly linked the grants to campus antisemitism concerns, calling the move “ideologically motivated.”

The White House immediately vowed to appeal. Officials argue that Harvard has no constitutional right to taxpayer dollars and must be held accountable for campus policies.

President Donald Trump had preemptively criticized Burroughs, an Obama appointee, and reiterated his demand that Harvard pay at least $500 million to settle disputes.

Harvard leaders welcomed the ruling but admitted uncertainty remains. The administration is simultaneously negotiating with other universities, including UCLA, Cornell, and Northwestern, while exploring new levers such as patent challenges.

The standoff underscores Trump’s broader second-term strategy of using executive authority to rein in elite universities and reshape federal higher education policy.

Related:

Obama-Appointed Judge Strikes Down Trump Freeze On Harvard Grants
A federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration acted unlawfully when it froze more than $2 billion in federal research funding to Harvard University. U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs, an Obama appointee, dismissed the administration’s claim that the cuts were aimed at combating antisemitism on campus. Instead,
White House Escalates Clash With Harvard Over Federal Funding
The Trump administration announced it will appeal a federal court ruling that ordered the government to restore more than $2.6 billion in funding to Harvard University. U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs, an Obama appointee, ruled that the administration’s decision to withhold the money amounted to unlawful retaliation

Comments

Latest