Is Genocide Being Redefined To Indict Israel?

By Konstanty Gebert, Project Syndicate | September 5, 2025

Given that the academic consensus on genocide recognizes only a handful of cases, it would be quite shocking for Israel – a country born from the ashes of the Holocaust – to be found guilty of the "crime of all crimes." Yet by massaging the meaning of the term, that is precisely what its critics are seeking to do.

WARSAW – There is a raging global debate about whether Israel’s actions in Gaza qualify as genocide. The United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide defines the offense as “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such.” The convention then enumerates incriminating acts, starting with “killing members of the group.”

Of course, such acts already constitute distinct crimes, including war crimes and crimes against humanity. What makes them genocidal is the “intent to destroy,” which is easy to allege but difficult to prove in a court of law.

Moreover, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ruled that genocidal intent must be “the only inference that could reasonably be drawn from the acts in question.” This high standard of proof is what sets genocide apart from other crimes committed in wartime. The uniquely evil intention is what makes it the “crime of crimes.”

Of all the massacres committed in human history, the academic consensus about instances of known genocide applies to fewer than a dozen cases. Thus, it would be particularly shocking if Israelis – given the role the Shoah (Holocaust) played in their own history – were to join such a mercifully small group of perpetrators.

In this context, expert opinion is very important. Many have been waiting for the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) to weigh in on the matter, and on September 1, it published a resolution doing so. Endorsed by 86% of IAGS members who decided to cast a vote, the document is unambiguous: “Israel’s policies and actions in Gaza meet the legal definition of genocide.”

But this hardly settles the matter, because the IAGS appears not to have held a debate about the central question of intent. Instead, the resolution defers to the opinion of other institutions and organizations that have taken positions on the issue. It is as if the International Genetics Federation voted to endorse the idea that acquired traits are heritable not by presenting arguments for the questionable claim, but simply by quoting others who already endorse the idea.

This omission becomes more understandable when we learn from Sara Brown, a two-term member of the IAGS’s advisory board, that there was no internal debate about the text. It was simply presented for approval, and, according to the BBC, only 28% of the group’s 500-odd members even participated in the vote. Moreover, while we do not know the identities of those who voted, IAGS does not require academic credentials for membership. Artists, activists, and others can also join.

Even though the resolution was passed by a minority of IAGS members whose academic qualifications are unknown, most media coverage of the document omits these ambiguities, preferring a narrative in which a global community of genocide scholars finds Israel guilty of committing a genocide.

But under the UN definition of genocide, it is all but impossible to reach such a conclusion, and Israel’s critics have admitted as much. For example, in declaring Israel guilty of genocide, Amnesty International concedes that the current definition is “an overly cramped interpretation of international jurisprudence and one that would effectively preclude a finding of genocide in the context of an armed conflict.”

Similarly, the Israeli human-rights group B’Tselem has deemed the legal definition too “narrow.” And the government of Ireland, joining the case that South Africa brought against Israel at the ICJ, says it is “concerned” that a “narrow interpretation of what constitutes genocide” leads to a “culture of impunity in which the protection of civilians is minimized.”

In other words, critics say that if it is not possible to declare Israel guilty of genocide under international law, the definition should be modified to accommodate that charge. Is this not exactly the kind of issue that the relevant academic community should address? Apparently, the IAGS thinks not. Instead, it says that Israel’s “indiscriminate and deliberate attacks against civilians” in Gaza have “killed more than 59,000 adults and children.” But even if one accepts this estimate, it assumes that none of the dead were combatants – as if Hamas did not exist.

The IAGS resolution also claims that the ICJ has found “that it is plausible that Israel is committing genocide in its attack in Gaza.” Yet according to the BBC, “Joan Donoghue, the president of the ICJ at the time of that ruling, said … that this was not what the court had ruled.” Instead, “the purpose of the ruling was to declare that South Africa had a right to bring its case against Israel and that Palestinians had ‘plausible rights to protection from genocide’ – rights which were at a real risk of irreparable damage.”

In other words, what passes as an airtight academic assessment is based in part on provable falsehoods and absurdities. This would be scandalous enough if it was confined to the IAGS. But, sadly, the resolution will probably be accepted as a dispositive expression of informed scholarly opinion.

Were that to happen, the pressure to redefine genocide would grow, with far-reaching implications for any conflict involving preventable civilian casualties. The Allied bombing of German and Japanese cities during World War II would suddenly become genocide, and the war itself could be deemed genocidal by both sides. Meanwhile, recognized cases – from the Armenian genocide (1915-16) and the Holocaust to the Rwanda genocide in 1994 – would lose all specificity, each becoming just another atrocity among many.

That would be the unavoidable price paid for redefining genocide to fit the IAGS resolution. But would accepting its conclusion – one endorsed only by a narrow cohort of its members – deepen our understanding of what constitutes genocide? And is such a price worth paying for unfairly indicting Israel for the crime of all crimes?

Konstanty Gebert is a Polish journalist, former anti-Communist activist, and the author of 14 books on Polish, Jewish, and international affairs.

Copyright Project Syndicate

1. Putin Is Really Keen For Zelensky Meeting To Happen In Moscow - Newsweek World

Russian President Vladimir Putin has publicly invited Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to meet in Moscow twice in one week, a location rejected by Kyiv.

The invitation follows U.S. President Donald Trump saying he intends to set up a meeting between the two leaders to end the war, but their failure to agree a venue presents a huge challenge to achieving peace.

Zelensky dismissed the invitation, arguing that Putin is actually trying to avoid negotiations taking place at all. "As I see it, if your aim is to prevent a meeting, then inviting me to Moscow is the way to go," he said at a press conference in Paris on Thursday.

2. Putin Warns Western Peacekeepers in Ukraine Would Be ‘Legitimate Targets' - The Moscow Times

President Vladimir Putin warned on Friday that any Western forces deployed to Ukraine would be a "legitimate" target for the Russian military, a defiant response to an allied plan to send international peacekeepers once a settlement to the war is reached.

A coalition of more than two dozen countries, led by France and Britain, announced on Thursday that they were prepared to send a "reassurance force" to Ukraine to patrol and enforce any eventual peace agreement. Ukraine has insisted that security guarantees backed by foreign troops are essential to prevent Russia from renewing attacks on the country.

"If some troops appear there, especially now during the fighting, we proceed from the premise that they will be legitimate targets," Putin said at the Eastern Economic Forum in the city of Vladivostok.

3. Russian Economy Slipped Into ‘Technical Stagnation,’ Sberbank CEO Warns - Moscow Times

Russia’s economy slipped into “technical stagnation” in the second quarter of this year, according to Sberbank CEO German Gref, who on Thursday repeated his past warnings that the Russian Central Bank’s tight monetary policy risked tipping the country into recession.

Speaking at the Eastern Economic Forum, Gref also said that July and August data suggested growth was now approaching zero.

“A main driver, of course, is the key interest rate. According to our internal estimates [at Sberbank], the rate will be around 14% by year-end. Is that enough for the economy to start recovering? In our view, it is not,” the banker added. “Given the current level of inflation, recovery can only be expected when the rate is at 12% or lower.”

4. Sweden Accuses Russia Of GPS Jamming - TIPP Insights

Sweden accuses Russia of being behind a significant rise in GPS signal jamming over the Baltic Sea, raising concerns for aviation in the region. Moscow denies the allegations.

5. China May Have Stolen Your Data—And Even Trump’s, Multiyear Probe Finds - Daily Signal

China may have stolen data from nearly every American, including President Donald Trump, a yearslong joint investigation by multiple intelligence agencies has concluded.

The group “Salt Typhoon,” which has ties to the Chinese Communist Party, reportedly hacked phones Trump and Vice President JD Vance used last year during the presidential campaign.

6. Bannon Says China Is An Existential Threat, Everything Else A ‘Sideshow' - Daily Signal

“We must decouple and hard decouple starting tomorrow morning.” That was former adviser to President Donald Trump Stephen K. Bannon, on the relationship between the United States and China in his remarks at the National Conservatism Conference in the District of Columbia on Thursday.

Bannon, who is the current host of the “WarRoom” podcast stressed in his discussion about “making American First” that the greatest, external existential threat to America is in Beijing and that everything else is a sideshow. He said that the American ruling class, including many Republicans, essentially sold out the country and allowed China to rise as an adversary to the United States.

7. Venezuelan Fighter Jets Conduct ‘Show Of Force’ Near US Navy Vessel - Marine Times

A set of Venezuelan military aircraft flew near a U.S. Navy vessel in international waters Thursday, two days after the U.S. said it struck a Venezuelan drug vessel, according to a Defense Department statement posted to X.

Two Venezuelan F-16s conducted the aggressive maneuver over the USS Jason Dunham, an Arleigh Burke-class Aegis guided missile destroyer, in a clear “show of force,” a U.S. defense official confirmed to Navy Times.

8. Anthropic Bars Chinese-Owned Firms Amid AI Security Push - TIPP Insights

Anthropic, the San Francisco-based AI company behind the Claude chatbot, announced Friday it will ban entities that are majority Chinese-owned from using its services, tightening restrictions on “authoritarian regions”.

The firm already blocks access from China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran, but said some groups have bypassed restrictions through subsidiaries in other countries. Under the updated rules, organizations more than 50 percent owned by companies in restricted jurisdictions will now be barred, regardless of where they operate.

9. NYT Report: Failed SEAL Mission in 2019 Left North Koreans Dead - TIPP Insighhts

A 2019 Navy SEAL mission in North Korea, approved by President Donald Trump, reportedly ended in failure and left unarmed civilians dead, according to The New York Times.

The operation aimed to plant an electronic device to intercept communications from North Korean leader Kim Jong Un during a period of delicate nuclear negotiations, the report said.

SEAL Team Six’s Red Squadron spent months rehearsing the mission, which involved deploying from submarines into North Korean waters.

10. Weak Jobs Data Fuels Pressure On Fed To Cut Rates - TIPP Insights

The U.S. job market slowed sharply in August, signaling deeper cracks in the economy under President Donald Trump’s trade and immigration policies.

Employers added only 22,000 jobs, far below forecasts of 80,000, the Labor Department reported Friday. The unemployment rate rose to 4.3%, the highest since 2021.

11. Carney Pushes For 'Buy Canadian' Policy And Pauses EV Targets For 2026 - BBC

Prime Minister Mark Carney has paused a key electric vehicle sales target while pushing for a "Buy Canadian" policy, as his government deals with the impact of US trade policies.

Canadian automakers will no longer be required to ensure 20% of new car sales are electric by next year, Carney said on Friday. New rules will also prioritise Canadian-made goods for federal contracts and include a fund to assist firms to develop new products.

The moves come as Canada's economy has shown signs of weakening - shedding 66,000 jobs in August and pushing unemployment to 7.1%.

"We cannot control what other nations do," Carney said. "We can control what we give ourselves - what we build for ourselves."

12. Visualizing The Magnificent Seven’s Foreign Revenue - Visual Capitalist

America’s tech giants earn huge sums of money from foreign revenue, underscoring their ubiquity in global markets.

From Nvidia to Microsoft, the Magnificent Seven companies earn 31% to 62% of revenues abroad. Not only does this expose them to shifting trade policy, but the enforcement of new digital rules across Europe, Canada, and Australia.

13. High Demand Of iPhone 17 Ahead Of Launch - TIPP Insights

A survey of 2,000 U.S. iPhone users finds that nearly seven in 10 plan to upgrade to one of the new iPhone 17 models – a meaningful rise of more than 6% on the same period last year.

14. Researchers Note Spike In Kidney Deaths Related To Blood Pressure - Health News

Deaths from blood-pressure-driven kidney disease have increased dramatically during the past quarter-century, according to a new study.

Deaths from high blood pressure-related kidney disease increased by nearly half in the U.S. over the past 25 years, researchers reported Thursday at an American Heart Association meeting in Baltimore.