The events that took place on Capitol Hill on January 6, 2021, are burned into our memories. It was a dark day for democracy, no matter which party you identify with.
To gauge America’s feelings about the day’s events, we chose about twenty-one words that various media, people, and institutions have used to describe it. We gave our 1,305 survey participants an option to select up to three words that they felt best to describe the events of January 6 in Washington, D.C.
The results read:
- Domestic terrorism - 25%
- Riot - 21%
- Protest - 15%
- Armed insurrection – 14%
- Unlawful entry – 13%
- Insurrection – 13%
- Vandalism – 12%
- Civil disobedience – 12 %
- Mob – 12 %
- Trespassing – 11%
- Demonstration – 10%
- Rebellion – 10%
- Sedition – 7%
- Looting – 6 %
- Uprising – 6%
- Siege – 6%
- Revolt – 5%
- Coup – 5%
- Mutiny – 4%
- Self-coup – 4%
- Petty theft – 3%
- Not sure – 13 %
Surprisingly, the word 'riot' is the only one that appears in the top five across party lines. Riot is ranked first among Independents, second among Republicans, and third among Democrats. It is worth noting that 26 percent of Independents, 22 percent of Republicans, and 19 percent of Democrats used the word "riot."
Beyond party leanings, political ideology plays a huge role in how the events on Capitol Hill are viewed. Here are the top five/seven picks based on ideology:
- 24% - protest
- 20% - riot
- 18% - demonstration
- 15% - civil disobedience
- 14% - unlawful entry
- 26% - domestic terrorism
- 25% - riot
- 17% - armed insurrection
- 14% - Insurrection
- 14% - Unlawful entry
- 41% - domestic terrorism
- 24% - armed insurrection
- 22% - insurrection
- 19% - riot
- 14% - vandalism
Similar to parties, Americans of all ideologies pick ‘riot’ among their top-5 choices.
America has been a democracy for more than two centuries. Respect for the nation’s symbols is an indelible part of the American culture.
Regardless of where you stand on the political spectrum, we can all agree on one thing: no American wants the events of January 6th, 2021, repeated.
The country must move beyond rhetoric and implement constructive changes that are acceptable to all citizens to ensure that.
The first step in moving forward is to understand the perspective of all sides. And we certainly hope that our data contributes to the groundwork.
- A new kit for Ukraine's football team, showing a map including Russian-annexed Crimea, has provoked anger in Moscow.
- Ukraine unveiled its shirt for Euro 2020, emblazoned with its borders, including Crimea, and the slogan "Glory to Ukraine!"
- The head of the Ukrainian football association, Andriy Pavelko, revealed the kit in a video on his Facebook page days before the European Championship kicked off.
- The front of the yellow shirt shows the contours of Ukraine in white, including Crimea and the pro-Russian separatist-controlled regions of Donetsk and Luhansk.
- The US embassy in Kyiv, Ukraine's capital, tweeted "love the new look" with a photo of the new kit.
- Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova criticized the kits, saying the football team had "attached Ukraine's territory to Russia's Crimea", creating the "illusion of the impossible."
- A pro-North Korea newspaper said that North Korea will continue to push for the unification of the Korean Peninsula, refuting claims that Pyongyang has abandoned the long-held wish in its latest revision to the ruling party's rules.
- North Korea held a rare congress of the Workers' Party in January. It revised the party rules, deleting such expressions as "uriminzokkiri" or "between our Korean people," and including such phrases as "coexistence" of the compatriots.
- Some experts see the changes as North Korea signaling that it has given up on its push for the unification of the Korean Peninsula and is instead seeking the coexistence of the two Koreas.
- The paper also noted that the party's rules clarify that the strong national defense capability is to safeguard stability and peace on the Korean Peninsula, which reflects Pyongyang's "unwavering" commitment to the unification of the Korean Peninsula.
- South and North Korea remain technically at war since the 1950-53 Korean War ended in a truce, not a peace treaty.
- WHO official Mike Ryan said the agency could not ‘compel’ China to share more but expects full ‘cooperation’ from member states.
- Asked by a reporter how the WHO will “compel” China to be more open, Mike Ryan, director of the agency’s emergencies program, said at a news conference that the “WHO doesn’t have the power to compel anyone in this regard.”
- The “Wuhan lab leak theory” has recently become the subject of renewed public debate after several prominent scientists called for a full investigation into the origins of the virus.
- The WHO head called for COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers to give the global jab equity scheme COVAX first refusal on new doses or commit half of their volumes to the WHO-backed initiative.
- WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus lamented the COVID-19 vaccine inequality, which he said has created a “two-track pandemic” with Western countries protected and poorer nations still exposed, renewing pleas for shot donations.
- Chinese birth control policies could cut between 2.6 to 4.5 million births of the Uyghur and other ethnic minorities in southern Xinjiang within 20 years.
- The research by Adrian Zenz is the first such peer-reviewed analysis of the long-term population impact of Beijing’s multi-year crackdown in the western region.
- But based on analysis of official birth data, demographic projections, and ethnic ratios proposed by Chinese academics and officials, Zenz estimates Beijing’s policies could increase the predominant Han Chinese population in southern Xinjiang to around 25% from the current 8.4%.
- The new research compares a population projection done by Xinjiang-based researchers for the government-run Chinese Academy of Sciences based on data predating the crackdown to official data on birth rates and what Beijing describes as “population optimization.”
- It found the population of ethnic minorities in Uyghur-dominated southern Xinjiang would reach between 8.6-10.5 million by 2040 under the new birth prevention policies.
- That compares to 13.14 million projected by Chinese researchers using data pre-dating the implemented birth policies and a current population of around 9.47 million.
Sign in or become a tippinsights member to join the conversation.
Just enter your email below to get a log in link.