Skip to content

Wedgewood Polling Deception Raises Questions About Election Survey Credibility

Major outlets, including The New York Times and MS NOW, had previously cited the firm’s data.

Wedgewood Polling Admits Most Surveys Were Fake in Claimed Experiment.Pic via(@WashTimes)

Wedgewood Polling admitted Tuesday that most of its surveys were fabricated, describing the operation as a “social experiment” intended to test how easily fake polling data could spread through the media.

Researchers Cooper Burton, Mary Radcliffe and G. Elliott Morris of FiftyPlusOne uncovered discrepancies in electronic data markers and confronted the firm, prompting its admission. Wedgewood said only one survey, conducted in Nebraska, was genuine. Major outlets, including The New York Times and MS NOW, had previously cited the firm’s data. Decision Desk HQ subsequently removed 17 polls, while Newsweek retracted three articles.

💡
Burton questioned whether the firm’s explanation was credible, suggesting it may have confessed to avoid further exposure. Columbia University statistician Andrew Gelman said the incident highlighted excessive reliance on polling data.

The scandal follows a similar case involving Median Strategies and has renewed calls for stronger safeguards against fabricated surveys and weaknesses in the polling industry.

Related Tweet:

Also Read:

Trump Says Midterm Campaign Spending Will Exceed $400 Million
Trump also claimed that over $300 million had already gone toward rallies and voter mobilization efforts, though that figure has not been independently verified.

Comments

Latest