Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson sharply criticized the court’s handling of a Louisiana redistricting dispute, warning that judges must avoid appearing politically motivated during an election year.
Speaking at an event hosted by the American Law Institute, Jackson said courts must remain “apolitical” and apply consistent legal standards in politically sensitive cases.
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson on Monday amplified her concern about a rare extra step the court took after its blockbuster decision limiting the Voting Rights Act, saying she fears the appearance of partisanship.
— USA TODAY (@USATODAY) May 19, 2026
“My view was it would be a more neutral way to… pic.twitter.com/pbnAAz2eG9
According to CNN, her remarks focused on the Supreme Court’s recent decision allowing Louisiana to quickly redraw congressional maps after a major ruling weakened the Voting Rights Act.
The report said Louisiana asked the court to bypass its usual waiting period so new maps could take effect before the midterm elections. The court approved the request in a brief unsigned order without explaining the vote breakdown. Jackson publicly dissented.
Jackson also criticized the court’s growing reliance on emergency rulings, arguing that the practice weakens normal judicial procedures and risks damaging public trust in the institution.
Also Read:
Why President Trump Is Suing The IRS And Treasury For $10 Billion
Tehran Signals Doubts Over U.S. Negotiations
