On March 18, we published an editorial arguing that the Supreme Court should end nationwide injunctions and restore judicial sanity. On Friday, June 27, 2025, in a truly landmark and historic 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court did just that.

President Trump won an impressive mandate last November, securing victories in all battleground states and the popular vote, a feat not achieved by a Republican since President Reagan. With a do-nothing Congress and only 3½ years left in his term, Trump is eager to accomplish the change that citizens want. Yet a dozen or so judges have thwarted most of his Executive Orders through Temporary Restraining Orders implemented nationwide. We are glad that the Supreme Court finally put an end to this nonsense.

The Deputy White House Chief of Staff, Stephen Miller, the architect of many of President Trump's immigration initiatives, reacted to the decision:

Policy after policy after policy was being decided not by the elected President… but by unelected judges — and in many cases, we're talking about unelected tyrants who were imposing their will on the entire nation. So, this is really a momentous ruling.

AG Pam Bondi, standing next to President Trump at the White House, pointed out that "35 of the 40 nationwide injunctions filed against this President... came from Maryland, D.C., Massachusetts, California, and Washington! That’s crazy! These 5 districts."

Here's our full March 18 editorial:

SCOTUS Needs To End Nationwide Injunctions And Bring Back Judicial Sanity

Three Justices Say Enough Is Enough—This Power Grab Has to Stop.

Ever since President Obama politicized Washington using his pen rather than doing the heavy lifting to convince Congress to pass his priorities, the presidential Executive Order has become the White House's mainstay of governance.

EOs result from the President's authority under the Constitution, particularly Article II, which outlines the executive branch's powers and powers delegated by Congress through legislation. EOs are typically used to implement policies, direct federal agencies, or clarify how laws should be enforced.

EOs come with restrictions, though. The Supreme Court can strike them down if they overstep constitutional bounds, or Congress can pass laws to counter them, though that's rare given the President’s veto power. They're also limited to the executive branch's scope; for instance, a President cannot rewrite tax law without Congressional approval.

The main bottleneck to presidential executive orders is the vast network of federal district judges, who are, by definition, supposed to be apolitical and neutral. However, organizations that challenge executive orders know how to court-shop and file complaints with their favorite judge.

Even this wouldn't ordinarily be an issue. A judge's ruling against an EO should only impact the district in which the judge presides. The United States federal judiciary has 677 district court judges (across 94 districts, including territorial courts like those in Puerto Rico and Guam). These are lifetime appointments under Article III of the Constitution.

The problem is that many federal judges deem the underlying challenge and their judgments so critical to "ensuring uniform relief" that they enter "nationwide injunctions," expanding the reach of their orders to all 677 district courts. Even the nine Appeals Courts do not have such a reach. Under our Constitution, only the decisions of the Supreme Court are of nationwide importance.

Until now, numerous interests, both liberal and conservative, have frowned on nationwide injunctions. However, since nothing of consequence has occurred, these judges continue to issue them.

A notable example of a nationwide injunction during the Biden administration occurred on December 7, 2021, when U.S. District Judge R. Stan Baker of the Southern District of Georgia issued a nationwide injunction blocking the enforcement of President Biden's COVID-19 vaccine mandate for federal contractors and subcontractors. This mandate, stemming from Executive Order 14042 signed on September 9, 2021, required employees of federal contractors to be fully vaccinated by January 18, 2022.

Seven states—Georgia, Alabama, Idaho, Kansas, South Carolina, Utah, and West Virginia—along with the Associated Builders and Contractors, sued, arguing the mandate exceeded federal authority and violated procurement laws. Judge Baker's ruling halted the mandate nationwide, not just for the plaintiffs, citing the need for uniform relief. The Eleventh Circuit later upheld the injunction in August 2022 but narrowed its scope to the plaintiff states and parties, allowing enforcement elsewhere unless blocked by other courts.

During Donald Trump's first administration, U.S. District Judge James L. Robart of the Western District of Washington issued a nationwide temporary restraining order (TRO) blocking key parts of Executive Order 13769, often called the "travel ban" or "Muslim ban." Signed on January 27, 2017, the order suspended entry for 90 days for nationals from seven predominantly Muslim countries—Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen—halted the U.S. refugee program for 120 days and indefinitely barred Syrian refugees. The state of Washington, later joined by Minnesota, challenged the order, arguing it harmed residents, businesses, and universities by disrupting travel, family reunification, and economic activity.

Judge Robart's TRO halted enforcement of the order nationwide, not just in Washington or Minnesota, citing the need for uniform immigration policy and the likelihood of irreparable harm to affected individuals. The ruling came after chaos at airports, with detentions and deportations already underway. On February 9, 2017, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously upheld the injunction, keeping it in place while legal challenges continued. The Trump administration eventually replaced the order with revised versions, and the Supreme Court later allowed a modified version of the ban to proceed in June 2018. Still, Robart's action remains a textbook case of a nationwide injunction from that period.

Three conservative Supreme Court justices have criticized this abuse of federal judicial power, citing their scope and impact on the separation of powers. Justice Neil Gorsuch has been particularly vocal. In a 2019 concurrence in Department of Homeland Security v. New York, he called them a "modern invention" that risks turning district courts into "one-judge vetoes" over national policy, arguing they bypass the traditional class-action process and disrupt the executive's ability to govern.

Justice Clarence Thomas has echoed this skepticism. In his 2018 concurrence in Trump v. Hawaii—the travel ban case—he questioned the constitutional and historical basis for nationwide injunctions, suggesting they exceed Article III's "case or controversy" limit and encroach on executive authority. He argued they weren't common until the mid-20th century and warned of "forum shopping," where plaintiffs pick sympathetic judges to derail policies.

Even Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in a 2020 statement respecting the denial of a stay in Barr v. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, flagged the issue, noting how these injunctions can create chaos by halting policies before higher courts weigh in, as seen with Trump's asylum restrictions. Chief Justice John Roberts has been more reserved but signaled unease in Trump v. Hawaii, emphasizing the Court's role in resolving such disputes over lower courts issuing sweeping relief.

Now, these justices have an opportunity to end nationwide injunctions forever. After a federal judge issued a nationwide injunction against Trump's EO on birthright citizenship, the Trump administration filed an emergency motion with the Supreme Court not only challenging the legalities of the order regarding birthright citizenship (that would come later) but complaining that the nationwide injunction was harmful and too broad.

In a victory for the Trump administration (and future presidents), the Court granted certiorari in Trump v. Washington, one of three related cases (Trump v. CASA Inc. and Trump v. New Jersey being the others), consolidating them to address both the scope of the nationwide injunctions and, potentially, the underlying constitutional question of the executive order's validity.

For the first time in decades, the Roberts Court may eliminate the cancer of nationwide injunctions once and for all. This could be the single most momentous decision this court season.

Further Reading:
David vs. Goliath? More Like a Podunk Pettifogger Playing God With Presidential Power
This companion editorial examined the legal and constitutional risks of nationwide injunctions, a topic now decisively addressed by the Supreme Court.

Trump Celebrates Supreme Court Win On Court Injunction Limits—TIPP Staff, TIPP Insights

1. Iran Has Only One Negotiating Chip Left: Its Survival—Victor Davis Hanson, The Daily Signal

2. It Doesn’t Matter If Iran Can Build a Bomb. It Matters If America Has the Guts to Bomb It, Again.—Victor Davis Hanson, The Daily Signal

3. The Left Calls Trump’s Iran Strike ‘Illegal.’ Its History Of Inconsistency Says Otherwise.—Victor Davis Hanson, The Daily Signal

4. The Key Nuclear Allegation That Started The War Was Coaxed From A Palantir Counter-Intelligence Algorithm—Alastair Crooke, The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity

5. National Security Expert Anticipates President Trump’s Next Move—Lorenzo Prieto, The Daily Signal

6. Trump Halts Iran Sanctions Relief After Ayatollah Declares 'Victory'—TIPP Staff, TIPP Insights

7. Trump’s Words For Israel After It Struck Iran Post-Ceasefire—Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell, The Daily Signal

8. Trump Didn’t Need Congressional Approval For Iran Strike—Cully Stimson, The Daily Signal

9. Duo Still Pressing For House War Powers Resolution On Iran, But Speaker Says It’s Not ‘Necessary’—Jacob Adams, The Daily Signal

10. ICE Arrests 11 Iranian Nationals, Including One Who ‘Reportedly Served As Iranian Army Sniper’—Virginia Allen, The Daily Signal

11. In Face Of Terrorist Sleeper Cell Threat, DHS Secretary Pledges To ‘Go After Them Before They Do Anything’—Virginia Allen, The Daily Signal

12. New Figures On Iranians Let In Under Biden Reportedly Emerge As US Braces For Tehran Counterattack—Jason Hopkins, DCNF

13. Supreme Court Gives Trump Administration Green Light To Deport Illegal Aliens To Third-Party Countries—Virginia Allen, The Daily Signal

14. MAGAnomics Momentum Collides With Paralyzed Powellnomics—Editorial Board, TIPP Insights

15. Voters Back Tariffs To Boost Jobs, U.S. Industries, But Fear Impact On Working Families: I&I/TIPP Poll—Terry Jones, TIPP Insights

16. SCOTUS Justice Takes Bold Stand Against The Constitution—Natalie Sandoval, DCNF

17. Judicial Insurrection Breaks New Ground As Judge Defies Supreme Court Itself—Tyler O'Neil, The Daily Signal

18. Big Beautiful Bill Must Reach My Desk By July 4: Trump—TIPP Staff, TIPP Insights

19. Thune Confident Budget Bill Remains On Track For Senate Passage—Jacob Adams, The Daily Signal

20. ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ Could Be Killed by This Under-The-Radar Disagreement—George Caldwell, The Daily Signal

21. Provisions Of ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ Get Scrubbing In Senate In Parliamentarian’s ‘Byrd’ Bath—George Caldwell, The Daily Signal

22. Johnson Warns Lawmakers Action On ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ Could Push Back Start Of July 4 Recess—George Caldwell, The Daily Signal

23. Senate Finance Health Care Reconciliation Provisions: Some Improvements But Some Glaring Omissions—Nina Owcharenko Schaefer, The Daily Signal

24. House Freedom Caucus Members Angered By Senate Changes To ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’—George Caldwell, The Daily Signal

25. Democrats Can’t Make Up Their Mind When It Comes to Trump And The National Guard—Deroy Murdock, The Daily Signal

26. Putin Blasts NATO For Ignoring Russia’s Security Concerns—TIPP Staff, TIPP Insights

27. Trump: Canada’s Tech Tax A “Blatant Attack,” Trade Talks Off—TIPP Staff, TIPP Insights

28. Newsom Sues Fox For $787 Million Over Trump Call Segment—TIPP Staff, TIPP Insights

29. GOP Targets Mamdani As Symbol Of Democratic Extremism Ahead Of Midterms—TIPP Staff, TIPP Insights

30. Cuomo Stays In NYC Mayor Race After Primary Loss—TIPP Staff, TIPP Insights

31. Trump Stood Up For Nigerian Christians Before. He Should Do It Again Now.—Sean Nelson, The Daily Signal

32. Are You Prepared for Your “One-Foot” Moment?—George Ford Smith, Mises Wire

33. What Americans Have To Lose If Meta Wins Its Antitrust Case—Autumn Dorsey, The Daily Signal

34. California Dems Blame Wildfires On Trump After Their Party Created Tinderbox Of Regs—Thomas English, DCNF

35. Does Transparent Monetary Policy Lead To Economic Stability?—Frank Shostak, Mises Wire

36. The Disasters Of Government Enterprise—Gregory Bresiger, Mises Wire

37. Erasing History To Advance The Socialist Revolution—Wanjiru Njoya, Mises Wire

38. The Purpose Of Production And The Economy: A Criticism Of Pronatalist Economics—Ryan Turnipseed, Mises Wire

39. House Set To Vote On Resolution Condemning LA Riots, Commending Law Enforcement—Jacob Adams, The Daily Signal

40. Trump Admin Issues Emergency Order As Power Grid Strains Under Summer Heat—Audrey Streb, DCNF

41. ‘Ask Mike Pence’: Thomas Massie Expands His War Of Words To JD Vance—Robert McGreevy, DCNF

42. Two Programs Fly Right In Face Of Left’s Favorite Trope About Conservatives And Womanhood—Mary Rooke, DCNF

43. Socialist On Brink Of Leading Center Of American Capitalism, Cuomo Concedes—Ireland Owens, DCNF

44. Trump’s Culture War Offensive Is Working—Mike Gonzalez, The Daily Signal

45. The States Leading America’s Drive Toward Secure Elections—Jack Fitzhenry, The Daily Signal

46. Contempt Authority: The Key To Empowering Immigration Judges—Cully Stimson & Brooklynn Scott, The Daily Signal

47. Republicans Press For ‘Golden Dome’ Missile Defense Shield—George Caldwell, The Daily Signal

48. Heritage Foundation Honors 5 Leaders in Educating About The American Founding—Jacob Adams, The Daily Signal

49. Southern Baptists Get Sports Betting Right—Jacob Ogan, The Daily Signal

50. DOJ ‘Digging And Looking’ Into Anti-Parent School Board Activity Under Biden Admin—Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell, The Daily Signal

51. New Bill Would Aim To Brand Major Muslim Group A ‘Foreign Terrorist Organization’—Virginia Allen, The Daily Signal

52. ‘This Isn’t Just Crime. It’s Terror,’ Senate Panel’s Hearing On Mexican Cartels Is Told—Jacob Adams, The Daily Signal

53. Senate’s Rebranded AI Moratorium Is Fatally Flawed—Daniel Cochrane & Jack Fitzhenry, The Daily Signal

54. Dem Lawsuit Seeks To Block Youngkin’s Picks For University Boards—Christina Lewis, The Daily Signal

55. Medicare Needs Major Reform—Sooner Rather Than Later—Robert Moffit, The Daily Signal 

56. Large Scale Perspective On The Heat—Joe Bastardi, CFACT

57. Former Harris Lawyer Now Works for A President She Called ‘Unfit To Hold Office’—Tyler O'Neil, The Daily Signal